Institut pisane potvrde kao pandan šutnja u obveznom pravu

master's thesis

• Title (english): Institute of written confirmation as a counterpart of silence in law of obligations
• Author: Lea Rakar
• Mentor: Petar Miladin (mentor)
• Committee member: Petar Miladin (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Tomislav Jakšić (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Antun Bilić (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Law; (Company Law and Company Law); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2023-07-07, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Law

Abstract

Rad razrađuje šutnju u obveznom pravu i institut pisane potvrde. Unatoč tome što je hrvatsko pravo prihvatilo pristup da šutnja ne znači pristanak, u radu se tumači članak 265. ZOO koji sadrži najvrjednije primjere slučajeva iz ZOO u kojima se šutnja ipak smatra prihvatom. Šutnju u obveznom pravu ne treba samo vezati uz članak 265. ZOO, već je važno tumačiti njen karakter i u institutu pisane potvrde. Pisana potvrda ima ponajprije zadaću osigurati sigurnost pravnog i poslovnog prometa. Navedeno se postiže, poštujući jedno od permanentnih načela obveznog prava, a to je načelo savjesnosti i poštenja. Pragmatično objašnjenje zašto šutnja obvezuje i koji je uopće pravni temelj instituta pisane potvrde u obveznom pravu može najkvalitetnije pružiti učenje o odgovornosti na temelju stvaranja pravnog privida odnosno o odgovornosti na temelju odnosa povjerenja.

Abstract (english)

Thesis elaborates silence in law of obligations and the institute of written confirmation. Despite the fact that Croatian law has accepted the approach that silence does not mean consent, the paper interprets Article 265 of the Law on Obligatory Relations, which contains the most valuable examples of cases in which silence is considered acceptance. Silence in law of obligations should not only be linked to Article 265 of the Law on Obligatory Relations , but it is important to interpret its character also in the context of written confirmation. The written confirmation has the primary task of ensuring the safety of legal and business traffic. The above is achieved by respecting one of the permanent principles of law of obligations, which is the principle of conscientiousness and honesty. The doctrine of fiduciary responsibility provides pragmatic explanation for the assertion that silence following a written certificate can impose responsibility for fulfillment.

• Keywords: šutnja; institut pisane potvrde; odgovornost na temelju stvaranja pravnog privida; konkludentne radnje; načelo savjesnosti i poštenja; poslovna veza
• Keywords (english): silence; institute of written confirmation; accountability for establishing legal illusion; concludent actions; the principle of conscientiousness and honesty; business relationship
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:199:561387
• Study programme: Title: Law; Study programme type: university; Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra prava (magistar/magistra prava)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2023-07-12 07:07:23