Načelo ne bis in idem u recentnoj praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava

master's thesis

• Title (english): Principle ne bis in idem in the recent jurisprudence of the European Court for Human Rights
• Author: David Ikić
• Mentor: Zoran Burić (mentor)
• Committee member: Zoran Burić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Marin Bonačić (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Elizabeta Ivičević Karas (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Law; (Criminal Procedural Law); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2023-09-11, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Law

Abstract

Cilj ovog rada bio je prikazati aktivnost Europskog suda za ljudska prava pri tumačenju načela ne bis in idem u razdoblju od 2018. do 2023. godine. U radu se sažeto prikazuju kriteriji koje je Sud razvio u ocjeni pojedinih elemenata ne bis in idem načela u svojoj prethodnoj praksi, a zaključno s presudom A. i B. protiv Norveške, te način na koji ih je primjenjivao u recentnim presudama. Analiziraju se slučajevi u kojima je Sud ponovio dosadašnja shvaćanja u ovom području, ali i oni u kojima je po prvi put primijenio načelo u novom kontekstu. Načelo se razmatra kroz analizu pitanja kaznenopravne naravi postupka, postojanja istog djela i dupliciranja postupka te se razmatraju neke od dvojbi koje su nastale u recentnoj praksi. Rad se zaključuje prikazom tumačenja Suda u pogledu pojma pravomoćne osuđujuće i oslobađajuće odluke te se analiziraju predmeti u kojima je Sud odlučivao o postojanju iznimki od primjene predmetnog načela.

Abstract (english)

The aim of this paper was to show the activity of the European Court of human rights in interpreting the principle of ne bis in idem in the period from 2018 until 2023. The paper summarises the criteria developed by the court in assessing certain elements of the ne bis in idem principle in its previous case-law, up until its case of A and B v. Norway, and the manner in which the Court applied them in its recent judgments. It analyses cases in which the court has reiterated its current understanding in this area, but also those cases in which it applied the principle for the first time in a new context. The principle is considered through the analysis of the issues of the criminal nature of the procedure, the existence of the same offence and duplication of the proceedings. In addition, some of the doubts that have arisen in recent practice are considered. The paper concludes with a presentation of the court's interpretation of the concept of final judgment and acquittal and analyses the cases in which the court decided on the existence of exceptions to the application of the principle in question.

• Keywords: ne bis in idem; Europski sud za ljudska prava; zabrana dvostrukog suđenja; isto djelo; dupliciranje postupka; pravomoćnost odluke
• Keywords (english): ne bis in idem; European Court of Human Rights; double jeopardy; same offence; duplication of proceedings; final decision
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:199:802340
• Study programme: Title: Law; Study programme type: university; Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra prava (magistar/magistra prava)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2023-09-18 10:53:09