Zaštita posjeda u rimskom pravu s osvrtom na suvremeno uređenje u hrvatskom pravu

master's thesis

• Title (english): Protesction of possessio in Roman Law with a reference to contemporary Croatian Law
• Author: Ivana Josipović
• Mentor: Henrik-Riko Held (mentor)
• Committee member: Saša Nikšić (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Tomislav Karlović (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Henrik-Riko Held (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Law; (Roman Law); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2022-07-05, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Law; Roman Law

Abstract

Cilj ovog rada je izložiti temeljne sličnosti i razlike u pogledu zaštite posjeda u rimskom pravu te suvremenog uređenja u hrvatskom pravu. Unatoč tomu što posjed označava faktičnu vlast u oba analizirana pravna sustava, isti izaziva pravne učinke. Najvažniji učinak jest samostalna pravna zaštita posjeda za kojom se potreba javila još u rimskome pravu i s mnogim sličnostima je prenijeta u suvremeno hrvatsko pravo. U predmetnom radu se pruža osvrt na razvoj posjeda u povijesnom kontekstu, pretorska zaštita putem interdikata, novine koje je uveo Justinijan na način da je delegirana ovlast za pružanje posjedovne zaštite na sudove, a u drugom dijelu rada je naglasak na suvremeno uređenje u hrvatskom pravu, potkrijepljeno s primjerima iz sudske prakse. Ključna načela koja su prenijeta iz rimskog uređenja su načelo ograničenog raspravljanja u pogledu zabrane raspravljanja i pozivanja na pravo tijekom posjedovne parnice i načelo hitnosti, te unatoč razlikama koje su posebno naglašene u predmetnom radu, cilj posjedovne zaštite od osnutka pa do danas je isti, a to je da se spriječi samovlasno smetanje posjeda i uspostavi narušen faktični odnos.

Abstract (english)

The aim of this master's thesis is to expose the fundamental similarities and differences in terms of the protection of possession between Roman law and contemporary regulation in Croatian law. Despite the fact that possession signifies factual authority over matters in both analyzed legal systems, it causes legal effects. The most important effect is legal protection of the possession, for which the need arose back in Roman law and with many similarities have been transposed into modern Croatian law. This paper provides an overview of the possession development in a historical context, praetorian protection through interdicts, the novelty introduced by Justinian in the way of delegation of power to the courts, and in the second part of the paper, the emphasis is on the contemporary arrangement in Croatian law, supported with examples of judicial decisions. Key principles in possession proceedings that arose in Roman law and which are transferred in modern Croatian law are the principle of limited debate regarding the prohibiton of arguing and invoking the right during the litigation and the principle of urgency, but despite of the differences between legal systems, which are emphasized in this paper, the objective of possession protection from its inception to the present day is the same, which is to prevent unjust dispossession and disturbance of possession.

• Keywords: Posjed; Samovlasno oduzimanje i uznemiravanje posjeda; Posjedovna zaštita; Pretorski interdikti; Posjednikovi prigovori; Privremene mjere
• Keywords (english): Possession; Unjust dispossession and disturbance of possession; Protection of possession; Possessory interdicts; Possessor's objections; Interim measures
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:199:196930
• Study programme: Title: Law; Study programme type: university; Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra prava (magistar/magistra prava)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2022-07-11 07:26:06