Prigovor prema Zakonu o općem upravnom postupku

master's thesis

• Title (english): An objection in General Administrative Procedure Act
• Author: Marina Katić
• Mentor: Mateja Held (mentor)
• Committee member: Mateja Held (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Frane Staničić (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Marko Turudić (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Law; (Administrative Law); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2024-09-05, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Law

Abstract

Osim rješavanja administrativnih pitanja unutar upravnog postupka, Zakon o općem upravnom postupku Republike Hrvatske također predviđa pet drugih oblika supsidijarne pravne zaštite koje nisu određene upravnim aktom. To uključuje tri vrste upravnih radnji – kao što su pokretanje postupka po službenoj dužnosti na temelju zahtjeva, davanje obavijesti o uvjetima za ostvarivanje i zaštitu prava, te zaštitu od drugih radnji tijela javne vlasti – zajedno s radnjama pružatelja javnih usluga i neispunjavanjem ugovornih obveza od strane javnih tijela (upravni ugovori). Iako je pohvalno što prigovori služe za zaštitu građana od nezakonitih radnji javnih tijela, regulacija tih prigovora u Zakonu o općem upravnom postupku nije dosljedna. Rad pruža temeljitu analizu svih odredbi Zakona o općem upravnom postupku s ciljem identificiranja bilo kakvih nedovoljnih ili neodgovarajućih regulacija određenih vrsta prigovora. Nakon analize odredbi Zakona o općem upravnom postupku kao i sudske prakse, rad predlaže poboljšanja za svaku vrstu prigovora, uz opći prijedlog da se cijeli postupak prigovora precizno uredi u posebnom poglavlju Zakona o općem upravnom postupku.

Abstract (english)

In addition to addressing administrative matters within the administrative procedure, the Croatian General Administrative Procedure Act also provides for five other forms of subsidiary legal protection that are not determined by administrative acts. This includes three types of administrative actions – such as initiating proceedings ex officio based on requests, providing information on conditions for the realization and protection of rights, and protection against other actions by public authorities – along with actions of public service providers and failures to meet contractual obligations by public bodies (administrative contracts). While it is commendable that objections serve to protect citizens from unlawful actions of public bodies, the regulation of these objections in the General Administrative Procedure Act is inconsistent. This paper offers a thorough analysis of all provisions of the General Administrative Procedure Act with the aim of identifying any insufficient or inadequate regulations concerning specific types of objections. After analyzing the provisions of the General Administrative Procedure Act and judicial practice, the paper proposes improvements for each type of objection, with a general suggestion to precisely regulate the entire objections procedure in a separate chapter of the General Administrative Procedure Act.

• Keywords: Zakon o općem upravnom postupku; supsidijarna pravna zaštita; upravni ugovori; prigovor; nezakonite radnje javnih tijela.
• Keywords (english): General Administrative Procedure Act; subsidiary legal protection; administrative contracts; objection; unlawful actions of public bodies.
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:199:116877
• Study programme: Title: Law; Study programme type: university; Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate; Academic / professional title: sveučilišni magistar/magistrica prava (sveučilišni magistar/magistrica prava)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2024-09-13 10:58:11