Postupak pred Arbitražnim sudom za sport i tužba za poništaj pravorijeka pred Švicarskim federalnim vrhovnim sudom

master's thesis

• Title (english): Proceedings at the Court of Arbitration for Sport and the Action for Setting Aside an Award before the Swiss Federal Supreme Court
• Author: Luka Radočaj
• Mentor: Hrvoje Sikirić (mentor)
• Committee member: Hrvoje Sikirić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Tena Hoško (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Dora Zgrabljić Rotar (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Law; (Private International Law); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2024-07-12, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Law

Abstract

ZA PONIŠTAJ PRAVORIJEKA PRED ŠVICARSKIM FEDERALNIM VRHOVNIM SUDOM“. Rad se sastoji od sedam glavnih poglavlja: 1. Uvod, 2. Povijesni pregled CAS-a, 3. Ugovor o arbitraži, 4. Redovni arbitražni odjel, 5. Žalbeni arbitražni odjel, 6. Tužba za poništaj pravorijeka pred Švicarskim federalnim vrhovnim sudom te 7. Zaključak.
U uvodnom poglavlju sam predstavio okruženje u kojem je CAS bio potreban kao objedinjujuće rješenje zato što su se sporovi u sportu do tada rješavali na potpuno različite načine što je dovelo do pravne nesigurnosti.
Iduće poglavlje se odnosi generalno na prvih 10 godina rada CAS-a i njegov tadašnji sastav. Također je obrađen i predmet Gundel koji je bio svojevrsna prekretnica u radu CAS-a i potpuno promijenio njegovu strukturu tako što je uveo ICAS što je pomoglo u ostvarenju jamstva neovisnosti.
Treće poglavlje se odnosi na ugovor o arbitraži te općenitije na zasnivanje arbitraže. Definiran je ugovor o arbitraži prema Newyorškoj konvenciji te su obrađene i pretpostavke za valjanost samog ugovora o arbitraži prema švicarskom zakonodavstvu.
Poglavlje o redovnom arbitražnom odjelu se fokusira na postupak pred tim odjelom. Također se spominje u detalje CAS Kodeks i njegove odredbe koje su bitne za postupak. Osim toga, predmetne odredbe se uspoređuju sa švicarskom zakonodavstvom.
Iduće poglavlje također se odnosi na postupak, ali žalbeni te se obrađuju posebnosti tog postupka.
Šesto poglavlje u detalje obrađuje institut tužbe za poništaj pravorijeka kakav je predviđen u švicarskom zakonodavstvu te predviđene žalbene razloge. Uz spomenuto se navode i presude ŠFVS-a kao primjeri.
U zaključku dajem svoje mišljenje o putu CAS-a kao institucije od nepovjerljivog i po nekima nepristranog sudišta do pravog arbitražnog suda.

Abstract (english)

The topic of the master's thesis is „PROCEEDINGS AT THE COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT AND THE ACTION FOR SETTING ASIDE AN AWARD BEFORE THE SWISS FEDERAL SUPREME COURT“. The paper consists of seven main chapters: 1. Introduction, 2. Historical Overview of the CAS, 3. Arbitration Agreement, 4. Ordinary Arbitration Division, 5. Appeals Arbitration Division, 6. Action for setting aside an award before the Swiss Federal Supreme Court and 7. Conclusion.
In the introductory chapter, I presented the environment in which the CAS was needed as a unifying solution because disputes in sports were previously resolved in completely different ways, leading to legal uncertainty.
The next chapter generally covers the first 10 years of CAS operations and its composition at that time. The Gundel case is also discussed, which was a turning point in the work of CAS and completely changed its structure by introducing ICAS, which helped ensure independence.
The third chapter deals with the arbitration agreement and arbitration in general. The arbitration agreement is defined according to the New York Convention, and the requirements for the validity of the arbitration agreement under Swiss law are also discussed.
The chapter on the ordinary arbitration division focuses on the procedure before that division. It also details the CAS Code and its provisions relevant to the procedure. Additionally, these provisions are compared with Swiss legislation.
The following chapter also addresses the procedure, but the appeals procedure, and discusses the specifics of that process.
The sixth chapter delves into the institute of the Action for setting aside an award before the Swiss Federal Supreme Court as provided for in Swiss legislation and the grounds for appeal. Swiss Federal Supreme Court judgments are cited as examples.
In the conclusion, I provide my opinion on the journey of the CAS as an institution from a distrusted and, for some, impartial tribunal to a true arbitral court.

• Keywords: 1. Arbitraža; 2. Arbitražni sud za sport; 3. Tužba za poništaj pravorijeka; 4. Ugovor o arbitraži; 5.Švicarsko zakonodavstvo; 6. Izuzeće arbitara; 7. Javni poredak; 8. Kompetenz-kompetenz
• Keywords (english): 1. Arbitration; 2. Court of Arbitration for Sport; 3. Action for setting aside an award; 4. Arbitration Agreement; 5. Swiss Legislation; 6. Challenge of Arbitrators; 7. Public Policy; 8. Kompetenz-Kompetenz
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:199:609873
• Study programme: Title: Law; Study programme type: university; Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate; Academic / professional title: sveučilišni magistar/magistrica prava (sveučilišni magistar/magistrica prava)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2024-07-25 11:13:21