Umješač s položajem jedinstvenog suparničara

master's thesis

• Title (english): Third Party Intervention by Joining Dispute
• Author: Mare Stojić
• Mentor: Marko Bratković (mentor)
• Committee member: Marko Bratković (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Aleksandra Maganić (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Juraj Brozović (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Law; (Civil Procedural Law); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2023-09-01, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Law

Abstract

Umješač s položajem jedinstvenog suparničara je procesnopravni institut prema kojem se, prema zakonu ili zbog prirode pravnog odnosa pravomoćna presuda donesena u parnici kojoj se pridruži odnosi jednako kao i na glavnu stranku. Zakonom o parničnom postupku ovaj je institut propisan jednom odredbom, a u praksi uzrokuje mnoge nedoumice. Pravni interes umješača s položajem jedinstvenog suparničara očituje se u tome što će se pravni učinci presude odnositi jednako na njega kao i na parničnu stranku kojoj se pridružio. Zato što se pravomoćna presuda odnosi neposredno na njega čak i kada ne stupi u parnicu, umješač s položajem jedinstvenog suparničara ovlašten je podnijeti izvanredni pravni lijek i ako do pravomoćnosti nije stupio u parnicu. Tako umješač s položajem jedinstvenog suparničara može poduzimati sve parnične radnje kao i sama stranka, a u slučaju kada su stranka i umješač poduzeli istu radnju sa suprotnim pravnim učinkom, bit će valjana povoljnija radnja. Sudovi tumačenjem odredbi materijalnog prava odlučuju kada će osoba koja se pridružila parnici imati status umješača s položajem jedinstvenog suparničara. U doktrini su podijeljena stajališta o tome koje parnične radnje može poduzimati umješač s položajem jedinstvenog suparničara, a prednost bi trebalo dati shvaćanju koje svoje uporište ima u načelu saslušanja stranaka. U radu je, dakle, riječ o odlukama suda o odnosima u kojima se pojavljuje institut s položajem jedinstvenog suparničara, položaju koji ima u parnici, njegova razlika u odnosu na nužno suparničarstvo, radnjama koje je ovlašten poduzeti i djelovanju pravomoćnosti na njega.

Abstract (english)

Third party intervention by joining dispute is is a procedural law institute which, according to the law or due to the nature of the legal relationship, a final judgment rendered in litigation to which it is joined applies as equally as to the main party. The Civil Procedure Act prescribes this institute in one provision, and in practice it causes many doubts. The legal interest of a third party intervener by joining dispute is manifested in the fact that the legal effects of the judgment will apply equally to it as well as to the litigant it joined. Because the final judgment applies directly to it even when it does not enter into litigation, a third party intervener by joining dispute is authorized to submit an extraordinary legal remedy even if it has not entered into litigation before the final judgment has become final. Thus, third party intervener by joining dispute is able to take all litigation actions like the party itself, and in the event when the party and the intervener took the same action with the opposite legal effect, the more favorable action will be valid. By interpreting the provisions of substantive law, the courts decide when a person who has joined the litigation will have the status of third party intervention by joining dispute. In the doctrine, there are divided views on which litigation actions can be undertaken by a third party intervener by joining dispute, and priority should be given to the understanding that has its foundation in the principle of the right to be heared before a court. The paper is, therefore, about the court's decisions on the relationships in which the institute appears, the position it has in litigation, its difference in relation to the compulsory joinder of parties, the actions it is authorized to undertake and the effect of finality of the judgement on it.

• Keywords: umješač s položajem jedinstvenog suparničara; pravomoćnost; pravni interes; stupanje u parnicu; parnične radnje; povoljne radnje; načelo saslušanja stranaka
• Keywords (english): third party intervention by joining dispute; finality; legal interest; entering into litigation; litigation actions; favorable actions; principle of the right to be heared before the court
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:199:090160
• Study programme: Title: Law; Study programme type: university; Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra prava (magistar/magistra prava)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2023-09-04 12:10:21