Upotreba tradicionalnih pravnih argumenata za opravdanje tumačenja i primjene članka 8. Europske konvencije zazaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda u praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava

master's thesis

• Title (english): Use of traditional legal arguments for justifying the interpretation and application of article 8. of the European Convetion on Human Rights by the European court of Human Rights
• Author: Ana Žagar
• Mentor: Luka Burazin (mentor)
• Committee member: Luka Burazin (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Mario Krešić (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Davor Petrić (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Law; (Theory of Law); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2023-04-13, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Law

Abstract

Ovaj rad tumačenje Europske konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda od strane Europskog suda za ljudska prava prikazuje posve različito od sve proučene literature. Umjesto izdvajanja u praksi Suda razvijenih specifičnih tumačenjskih doktrina, pokazuje se da Sud koristi i tradicionalne tumačenjske argumente, kako ih je popisao Giovanni Tarello. Dokazivanjem da Sud u tumačenju i primjeni Konvencije rabi argumente s dugom povijesti upotrebe, a koje rabe i domaći sudovi prilikom tumačenja i primjene nacionalnih propisa, želi se obeshrabriti ideje o proizvoljnosti tumačenja Suda u Strasbourgu i poboljšati njihovo razumijevanje na nacionalnoj razini. Metoda rada je kvalitativna analiza sadržaja, a presude su odabrane kombinacijom namjernog i slučajnog uzorkovanja.

Abstract (english)

This paper presents the interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by the European Court of Human Rights, in a manner that is different from all of the studied literature. Instead of distinguishing the specific interpretation doctrines developed through the Court's case law, it proves that the Court also uses traditional interpretation arguments, as listed by Giovanni Tarello. By proving that the Court, in its interpretation and application of the Convention's provisions, uses arguments with a long history of use, the same ones used by domestic courts when interpreting and applying national legislation, this paper aims to discourage claims about the arbitrariness of those interpretations and to improve their understanding at the national level. The method applied is qualitative content analysis, and the judgments were selected by a combination of purposive and true random sampling.

• Keywords: Europski sud za ljudska prava; Europska konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda; članak 8.; tumačenjske doktrine; tumačenjski argumenti; kvalitativna analiza sadržaja.
• Keywords (english): The European Court of Human Rights; The European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; Article 8; Doctrines of Interpretation; Arguments of Interpretation; Qualitative Content Analysis.
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:199:269156
• Study programme: Title: Law; Study programme type: university; Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra prava (magistar/magistra prava)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2023-04-18 08:01:31