Usporedba uređenja odgovornosti za pravne nedostatke prema Zakonu o obveznim odnosima i Konvenciji Ujedinjenih naroda o ugovorima o međunarodnoj prodaju robe

master's thesis

• Title (english): Comparison of the regulation of liability for legal defects according to the Civil Obligations Act and the Uinted Nations Convention for the International Sale of Goods
• Author: Marta Telebuh
• Mentor: Hrvoje Markovinović (mentor)
• Committee member: Hrvoje Markovinović (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Antun Bilić (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Tomislav Jakšić (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Law; (Company Law and Company Law); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2022-09-22, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Law

Abstract

Kupoprodaja je najfrekventniji posao kako nacionalnog, tako i međunarodnog pravnog prometa, međutim ponekad predmet kupoprodaje može biti opterećen pravnim nedostacima. Kupoprodaja i posljedično institut pravnih nedostataka u hrvatskom je pravu uređen Zakonom o obveznim odnosima (dalje: ZOO), dok je na međunarodnoj razini najrasprostranjeniji dokument koji uređuje oba instituta s najvišim međunarodnim političkim autoritetom Konvencija Ujedinjenih naroda o ugovorima o međunarodnoj prodaji robe (dalje: Bečka konvencija). U samom uređenju instituta pravnih nedostataka prema ZOO-u i Bečkoj konvenciji postoje brojne razlike koje se mogu razumjeti u kontekstu različitosti međunarodne i nacionalne prodaje robe. Primarna razlika očituje se u činjenici da Bečka konvencija pravne nedostatke uređuje dvojako - na različit način uređuje pravne nedostatke bazirane na pravu industrijskog ili intelektualnog vlasništva od pravnih nedostataka utemeljenih na drugim pravima. S druge strane ZOO ne radi takvu podjelu, već sve pravne nedostatke, neovisno o pravu na kojem su utemeljeni, uređuje na jednak način. Dalje, u odnosu na hrvatsko pravo, Bečka konvencija značajno proširuje pojam pravnog nedostatka. Naime, dok prema hrvatskom pravu pravo trećeg mora postojati da bi se smatralo da postoji pravni nedostatak, prema Bečkoj konvenciji je dovoljno da postoji samo pretenzija ili tvrdnja o postojanju prava. Također, postoje razlike u zahtjevima koje postavljaju ZOO i Bečka konvencija s obzirom na znanje prodavatelja i kupca. Konačno, postoje značajne razlike u uređenju i posljedicama nepoštivanja obveze obavješćivanja.

Abstract (english)

Sale is the most frequent legal transaction of both national and international legal traffic, however, sometimes the object of purchase can be burdened with legal defects. Sale and consequently legal defects in Croatian law are regulated by the Croatian Obligation Act, while at the international level the most widespread document governing both institutes with the highest international political authority is the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (hereinafter: CISG). There are numerous differences in the regulation of legal defects according to the Croatian Obligation Act and the CISG which can be understood in the context of differences between international and national sale of goods. The main difference is that the CISG regulates legal defects in two ways - it regulates legal defects based on industrial or intellectual property rights in a different way than legal defects based on other rights. On the other hand, the Croatian Obligation Act does not make such a differentiation, but regulates all legal defects in the same way, regardless of the law on which defects are based. Furthermore, in relation to Croatian law, the CISG significantly expands the concept of legal defects. While according to Croatian law the right of a third party has to exist to be considered there is a legal defect, according to the CISG it is sufficient that there is only a pretension or assertion (claim) of the existence of a right. Also, there are differences in the requirements set by the Croatian Obligations Act and the CISG with regard to the seller’s and buyer’s knowledge. Finally, there are significant differences in the regulation and consequences of non-compliance with the notification obligation.

• Keywords: Ključne riječi: pravni nedostaci; međunarodna prodaja robe; Bečka konvencija; kupoprodaja; ZOO; intelektualno vlasništvo.
• Keywords (english): Keywords: legal defects; international sale of goods; CISG; sale; Croatian Obligation Act; intellectual property
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:199:281233
• Study programme: Title: Law; Study programme type: university; Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra prava (magistar/magistra prava)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2022-09-28 13:08:36